Sarah Grynberg: Greatness Guide
A Life of Greatness
Esther Perel: What Makes Relationships Thrive
0:00
-56:34

Esther Perel: What Makes Relationships Thrive

Does romantic love carry a one-fits-all approach, or is it something we can cultivate individually with our partner? Joining Sarah Grynberg is psychotherapist and New York Times bestselling author Esther Perel, who is recognized as one of today's most insightful and original voices on modern relationships. In this eye-opening conversation, Sarah and Esther delve into how to make relationships last; infidelity & why even happy people cheat; and the importance of having meaning and purpose beyond caring for our kids. If you wish to restore and bring light back into your seemingly fractured relationships, or wish to understand how to reframe your perspective on the wonder that is love; then let this very special chat and Esther’s heart-felt words not only give you the confidence to cultivate healthy bonds with others, but help you see the presence of love: as the only thing we will ever truly need in this world.


EPISODE TRANSCRIPT:

Sarah:

Esther Farrell, welcome. You are here off the back of a sold out tour in

Australia,which is amazing and I like to start at the beginning. I want to

hear a bit about your upbringing and the fact that you grew up with

two parents that were Holocaust survivors, and I'd like to know how

that experience was for you and what you learnt from them.

Esther:

That would be a biography. That's not just one question. I think

that there are two primary lessons. If I think of what the

experience of my parents, who they were, the survivors, but they

were also the sole survivors of their entire family, and so to

speak, they had a five year lockdown in a concentration camps, and

they gave me a lot of lessons about how one maintains oneself in a

literal lockdown. That was one of the big things is how do you face

hardships, and what do you do to maintain a sense of aliveness and

vibrancy and hopefulness, and how do you stay connected to your

imagination and to the spirit, when everything else is dehumanizing

and it doesn't have to be taken in its extreme version, but it is

the permission to experience pleasure in the midst of tragedy, in

the midst of misery, and the importance of experiencing pleasure or

the erotic curiosity, nature, art, and the deep ties with other

people that were offsetting the cataclysmic experiences that they

were having. So that was one major piece. And the second one was

that it's the quality of your relationships that determines the

quality of your life. They had nobody. They had nobody. They were

each the youngest one of nine children in a family in one of seven.

So they had to rebuild community literally and really learn to

create what we today call family of choice. But that was done

without the same name, and that's what we had. And so I think that

my parents were deeply interested in relationships and so am I.

Sarah:

Did they ever talk to you about how they move through that

trauma of having their families die, and then having that isolation

of thinking, who do I have around me? And then obviously they met

each other after they left the camps. How did they move through that

with each other?

Esther:

So I was very lucky that I had parents who were storytellers.

Yeah. And they also were very good curators. They knew to tell the

stories that we could tolerate listening, and they did that for

themselves, probably not even intentionally, but very adaptively.

And they did that for their children and for anyone else who was

interested in them, because they were characters figures that people

really wanted to hear from and what my parents understood.

Naturally, my parents and their entire cohort is that collective

trauma because they had gone through a collective trauma. It wasn't

just an individual trauma. The man that collective resilience, you

don't go through this alone. You find other people who went through

the same or similar experiences. You find other survivors. You find

rituals that you will create with those survivors. You find ways to

commemorate and to bring memory and to keep the dead into your

memory and into the public space. And all of this was done without

any therapy. Very few survivors went to therapy, but they did quite

well. The first thing they did, by the way, is have children,

because if you had a child, you were still human. It meant you could

still procreate. It was a fundamental of the expression of your

humanity was to have children. Some of them were better parents than

others, no doubt. But all in all, it's a group that managed to

rebuild, to move to another country, to learn new languages, to

raise their children in a foreign place, to have jobs. But they did

it very much in a collective way. They came together with other

people who experienced the same thing. Um, and everything has to be

learned. Not everything, but so many things. Have been learned from

watching the way that this particular group of survivors of a

genocide dealt. It was applied to Cambodia, it was applied to

Armenia, it was applied to many other places afterwards and today,

to many of the survivors of all the big catastrophes going on. By

the way, the word trauma was never mentioned. That was not in the

vocabulary. What we went through is undescribable. Nobody could

understand it. We went through terrible things. There was no need to

describe in utter details all the terrible things um, we have.

There's so much we can learn from the way that particular group did

it. And by the way, most importantly, it was the first group that

coined the term adult trauma, really, before World War two. We never

thought of trauma as something that can happen in your adult life.

Freudian theory posited that this was something you experienced in

the first five years of your life. It's all in childhood. The idea

that actually you may have had a perfectly fine life, and then one

day you have a traumatic event that leaves you with scars for the

rest of your life that began after World War two.

Sarah:

Well, isn't that so interesting? It's funny, I was talking to

someone the other day. We're actually talking about you, and I said

that your parents were Holocaust survivors, and my grandpa was a

Holocaust survivor, also in Poland and hidden in the forest, and has

his own story, as they all do. I've interviewed on the podcast, a

Holocaust survivor, she's 91 now, one of the happiest people I've

ever met, and it's so interesting how we can look to them. And I

suppose in psychotherapy and you have the work of Viktor Frankl and

all these amazing people and how we can use that trauma in looking

at today's world and how we move through certain emotions and how we

deal with pain. And these people have been through so much, but it's

really interesting to see how a lot of them prevailed, indeed, in

such a graceful way. And I remember this one woman saying to me, I

don't hate anyone I would never hate. I think what they did wasn't

right, but how could I have hate in my heart? And I just think

that's such an incredible thing.

Esther:

The definition of the word trauma really shifts when you look at

survivors or victims of torture, political violence, war,

psychosocial trauma, disasters, pandemics. You look at the

experience of trauma as a cataclysmic event that leaves you

powerless in the moment and thereby you freeze. And your reaction to

that event is what becomes the basis for PTSD. It's not the event

itself that is the trauma. It's your reaction to it and the

powerlessness, the frozen ness, because something is overwhelming,

like those major events in the recent years, we have redefined

trauma as developmental trauma, primarily issues that have happened

to you in childhood, and they are often more individual based

trauma. And that's a very different definition. So we're using the

same word, but it actually exists now on a continuum. In both cases,

the term that is not often used enough because we are very much

invested in studying post-traumatic stress disorder, and we don't

spend enough time thinking about post-traumatic growth.

Sarah:

What actually does help? How do people come out of it, and what

is the power of social connection for that? More than anything else,

you can do all the self-regulation and all the meditation, all of

that is very useful and important. But fundamentally, the power of

social connection is the most important thing because trauma is

about disconnection. It's about massive loss and unresolved grief.

So the reconnecting is part of the repair.

How come you think some people move through trauma?

It's the million dollar. Question in.

A way that they can deal with it and others can't. Is it to do

with the way that they're brought up, is that.

Esther:

It's really the million dollar question. Honestly, why in the

same family, the two people go through the same events and one

person manages to use it as the source of their impetus and their

drive in life, and the other person gets completely crushed by it.

You know, there's a beautiful project in the prisons in the United

States where they bring in CEOs and heads of companies to go and

spend time with inmates, lifelong inmates. And one of the most

interesting findings about what is the difference between those who

are behind bars and those who are not, and who could have been, who

also almost ran over somebody who also had car accidents, who also

were way too drunk, who also. And the big Distinguisher Discerner is

having had someone who believed in you, the mentor, the teacher, the

coach, somebody who took a special interest in you and gave you

constantly a different picture of yourself than the one that you

were holding.

Sarah:

Isn't that interesting?

Esther:

That is one of the most interesting things. So anytime somebody

has made it, whatever they made, it means they were able to love

again, to create family, to have friends, to have a job, to believe

in, something you know, to create. I think one of the first question

I ask is, who was there for you? Was there someone outside of the

family system, for that matter, a neighbour, an aunt, a grandparent?

And yesterday at the event here in Melbourne, we had one of the card

questions of where should we begin? And it was a conversation that

you could have again. And so many people would probably say, my

grandmother or my grandfather, the person who impacted my life that

doesn't even know it. The person to whom I have a big thank you. The

person that held me in esteem when I didn't have enough of it for

myself.

Sarah:

That is such a big thing, isn't it? And I reflect on that as

well. Being in the line of work I'm in, I always think of those

people that saw something in me when maybe others didn't see

anything, or when I felt that I was at my lowest and they believed

in me. And that belief of someone else having that in you allows you

to move forward. And did you have someone like that in your life?

Esther:

I probably have had more than one. Yeah, I've had teachers,

mentors, friends, my brother, my husband for sure. Yes. I always had

this image of an elevator safety shaft that everybody, when they

fall because we will fall, has this scoop underneath that makes sure

that you can fall, but you won't hit the ground. And it's that

little space between the fall and the crash that is so important.

Who makes it? It depends how well you navigate the institutions. The

one who makes it is sometimes the one who managed to stay under the

radar in school. The outwardly aggressive often makes it less than

the much more collapsed and explosive one, rather than the explosive

one, because it is less disruptive in a classroom. If once you start

to be kicked out of the classroom and you, sometimes it becomes a

snowball effect of all the other institutions where you want last.

So being able to navigate the institutions that socialize us

throughout our lives is probably an important one, too, in terms of

who makes it. It's multifactorial, but it ultimately is one of the

most mysterious questions why this person came out of this stronger.

And the other one came out of this broken arm.

Sarah:

That's so fascinating. You obviously got into psychotherapy, but

you studied theater for a while. What made you move into wanting to

do psychotherapy?

Esther:

I studied both from the beginning. Yeah, I was an I did theater

as a teenager throughout my adolescence, and I was deeply interested

in psychology from my adolescence on starting at age 14. So I was

interested in education because I hated school. I hated the way they

treated us in school as students. I hated the whole repressive

system that I was in, so I got to reading everything about

alternative education. From there, I went into psychology, so I've

always had a deep interest in both. I studied psychodrama, which was

a way of finding ways to use theater. I understood Greek theater and

the power of it, and I understood that much of our life is a

theater. It's a stage. We perform, we perform roles. So psychodrama

became a very good structure for me to integrate the two, and I

became I always thought I would do both. For some reason, when I

came to New York, I realized that I was going to have an easier time

becoming a therapist and becoming an actress. I didn't want to be a

waitress.

Sarah:

I wanted to ask you, obviously, relationships is a big thing to

you, and you talk a lot about eroticism and you do it in such a

beautiful way. And you say, which I love, eroticism is our life

force. And I wanted to talk about that a little bit more and explore

what that actually means.

Esther:

The typical definition of eroticism in modern times is sexual

exciting. Turn on a repertoire of sexual techniques urges. But there

is a long standing mystical definition of eras as life force that

which makes you feel alive, vibrant, energized, vital. That which

allows you to deal with deadness, death, catastrophe, loss. And, um.

It is too bad that the word has been narrowed. Of course, eroticism

is what makes sex great, but it is also what makes life worth

living. Yes. It's the ability in the middle of grief to actually

still experience love, connection, hope. Otherwise, what are we

holding on to? So I have really wanted to use that term, and I

discovered it when I was writing Mating in Captivity, because I

realized slowly that I was not so interested in sex per se.

Sexuality. What people do if they have sex, how often, how hard, how

many orgasms, and all the measurable stuff that I was really

interested in, the experience in the the and that the eroticism is

really defined by the central agent is your imagination, not what

you do. You can do sex and feel nothing. Women have done that for

centuries.

Sarah:

I loved when I was at your talk last night how you got everyone

to stand up. And there was one bit where you asked, has anyone ever

had consensual sex? And that they enjoyed it when they didn't get

much out of it? I think there was not a person sitting. Everyone was

standing when you said that, right?

Esther:

That in itself could be a whole evening, right? The amount of

stories that are behind that. And it wasn't just women and it wasn't

non-consensual and it was maybe consensual, but not wanted or not

clearly wanted, or in any case, it was really lackluster. Yes, that

that is incredible. How many people will have a sexual life that is

not nearly what they would hope for it to be, or sometimes they

don't even know what it could be. Yes. So eroticism is the poetry of

sex. Eroticism is when Octavio Paz talks about it, the senses become

servants to our imagination. It's when you can see the invisible and

hear the inaudible. Or Audre Lorde talks about eroticism as an act

of self-preservation and political warfare. It's extremely

important. There's a lot of it that is subsumed under it, and it's

an intelligence that is cultivated. We are all born sensuous and we

become erotic. We learn what are the ways that we stay connected to

life, to others, to hope, to nature, to art, to curiosity. Everyone

there trajectory for that. But that is the force and it is the

opposite. It's what Freud used to call Eros and tantos. There was a

moment yesterday in the Melbourne talk that was also very powerful,

where one man talked about his trauma, experience with sexual abuse.

And too often when we talk about trauma, we are dealing with the

actual experience of the event itself. But we don't talk about the

rehabilitation. It's one thing to take an arm that was broken, put

it in a cast, then take off the cast. But you still need to retrain

the arm to be used. Yes, that's the erotic recovery. That arm has to

come back to life. It needs to reintegrate the body and then the

world. That's eroticism. Erotic recovery is really core to our

ability to sustain ourselves.

Sarah:

Do you think having a sexual relationship is a must? I mean,

there are so many people who could say that they're in love with

each other, but they don't have sex anymore. They may have had sex

to have kids. As time passes, they don't have sex. Is it fundamental

in a successful relationship to keep on having sex?

Esther:

Depends. For whom? Hmm. For some people, not at all. Yeah. There

is a wonderful way to have an affectionate companionate

relationship. This was a wonderful way to have multiple friendships

with whom you have deep love and intimacy and no primary romantic

relationship. Yeah, that's not one way to live life. It depends for

whom. I would say we can live without sex, but we can't live without

touch. Yes, if we don't get touched, we become irritable. We become

aggressive. We become depressed. Touch is essential. And if it's not

from a person, it will be from a pet. But we need touch. Do we need

the sensuality of touch? Yes, probably. If you watch the way people

stroke the pet, the cat or the dog, you will see tremendous

sensuality. This is sexual or erotic if you prefer. If you see how

people hold little. It is erotic. It is sensual. It doesn't mean

it's sexual, but it. It is vibrant. It is alive. It is connective.

There is pleasure in it. The pleasure of holding this fragile little

human being in your arms. I think that your question needs to be

redefined. Before I answer it, I would have to ask, what do you mean

by sex? Can people live without sex? Means what can they live

without? Heteronormative penetrative sex that ends with an orgasm

and proves something has happened? Yes, of course they can. Yeah. Do

people have a sexuality in their lives no matter what? Because they

have a body. Because they have genitals, because they can touch

themselves. Because they can take care of themselves, because others

can please them, then that's a very different kind of question. And

still you can live a beautiful life that touches on this, but

doesn't really necessarily have a three course meal.

Sarah:

What is the difference between love and lust?

Esther:

Love and desire. Yeah, they relate, but they also conflict. And

that's where the mystery of eroticism lies. You can desire without

love, and you can love without desire. So this goes back to your

question. Can you live without, you know, living in a sexualized

relationship? By the way, it works quite well if both people are

similar.

Sarah:

Yes.

Esther:

The problem occurs because one person wants a very different

experience than the other. But love. Love comes with a sense of

responsibility. Love comes with a sense of worry, of caretaking, of

anxiety for the well-being of the other person. Desire needs freedom

to thrive. It needs to be carefree. It needs to be unselfconscious.

It needs to be able to momentarily enter inside oneself, which is

one of the reasons why sometimes it's a challenge for women, because

they find themselves too often in the role of caretaker, in the role

of responsible for the well-being of others, and at that moment

cannot separate themselves enough from that task to be able to

become playful and enter themselves. So the very things that nurture

love sometimes stifle desire.

Sarah:

I heard you say as well, that idea of caretaking, a neediness,

being sort of a shut down. And I find that so interesting. And I

think that a lot of mothers that I've spoken to, a lot of stay at

home mothers that might not earn their own money, and they're

reliant a lot upon their husbands. They feel this loss of power. And

then sometimes there starts to be this gap between the two of them,

and it's the woman desiring something else, and then maybe the

husband as well, because he sees his wife in the position that that

love and that desire between the two of them seems to have kind of

fallen. Have you seen a lot of that in your experience?

Esther:

I wrote an entire book about it. Mating in captivity is all

about understanding. Yes, the dilemmas of desire in long term

relationships.

Sarah:

Yes.

Esther:

But I will answer it to you. Like this I took a question around

the world for the last 15 years, and I have yet to hear something

different. And the question was, I find myself most drawn to my

partner when and I asked it in multiple cultures, and there were

literally four groups of answers all the time. And that's when I

began with this issue of the caretaking. It didn't just appear out

of nowhere. It's because I kept listening. People would say, I'm

most drawn to my partner when I see them in their element, when I

admire them, when they're doing something that they are passionate

about, when they're in the passionate can be on the horse, on the

beach, on the stage, you name it. And all of it was when I see my

partner radiant, thriving, and their otherness is momentarily

defined in front of me. They are self-sustaining, they're selfsufficient,

they don't need anything from me. And in that moment,

there is this energy between me and them. I'm drawn to them. I'm

attracted to that person. There is never caretaking in that

scenario. Caretaking is deeply loving, but it is an anti aphrodisiac

because you are in touch with the fragility of the other person. And

desire and lust involve a loss of control. They involve letting go

and in order to let go, you need to feel that this person here is

steady. Then you can do this. But if this person falls also, then

there's nothing holding you back.

Sarah:

Yes.

Esther:

Now on the woman is the most interesting one. If I work with

straight couples, it is very common that you will hear a man say

nothing turns me on more than to see her turn down.

Sarah:

S2: That makes sense.

Esther:

Yeah. Giving generous partner will often say that I have never

heard a woman say that highly. Not never. I've rarely heard. Nothing

turns me on more than to see him turn down is rather irrelevant for

her. What turns her on is her own turn on.

Sarah:

Wow. Why is that?

Esther:

Because in desire for the woman of female sexuality at that

moment demands a certain amount of narcissism in the best sense of

the word. It demands her ability to be self-focused. If she's

thinking of the little ones, if she's thinking about the partner, if

she's thinking about her sense of responsibility and caretaking, she

cannot disconnect enough to connect with herself in the presence of

this other person. So this deer that you're talking about with the

women who are continuously defined by what they do for everybody

else and don't have much agency, it's not just the fact of going

into the world and making their own money, it's that this being

outside in the world with agency calls upon completely different

parts of yourself.

Sarah:

Yes.

Esther:

And those become connected with the erotic charge. What turns

her on is what is happening to her. And in order for that to happen,

she needs to be able to focus on herself. And that's what happens

when she's out in the world doing her stuff.

Sarah:

That makes like you right here, right now.

Esther:

It's that whole Viktor Frankl about purpose and meaning is what

made some people last in the camps. Having that outside of your

children and looking after a house and caretaking it does. It gives

you this sense of feeling that you're helping others, but you're

doing also something for yourself that gives you purpose and meaning

in your life. Yep. I want to talk about infidelity. And I wonder

with the patients that have come into your care. Why do you see it

occur? And I feel that for a while people thought it was always the

males that were the ones that were having affairs. But we now know

that there is a lot of women that are having affairs as well, and

I'm sure it potentially is equal. Why do you think that occurs?

Sarah:

S4: Affairs. Yeah.

Esther:

S3: Well, first of all, who have the men been having affairs with

this idea that it was only the men?

Sarah:

You know, the.

Penny just dropped in. Yes.

Yeah.

Esther:

You know, some of them may have gone to other men, but many of

them went to other women. Right? Affairs have always existed. They

have been part of the story of marriage, transgression, infidelity.

It was indeed primarily a privilege of men because they were more

protected. Because women were possession of men, they were the

property of men. And so where the children and she had everything to

lose. And women have rarely done what they wanted. They have done

what would keep them safe and still do so in the majority of the

world. So the rate of female infidelity goes up when women become

more equal and able to take care of themselves and are protected by

law and are not going to lose everything and become destitute. Yes,

that's what changes the rate of female infidelity, economic

independence, legal protections, affairs occur for a host of

reasons. Some of them are connected to the relationship. Loneliness.

Number one sex lessness indifference, chronic bickering, lack of joy

in neglect, act, um, contempt. All the reasons that make people want

to flee. Mhm. So you have a whole range of infidelities that are a

reaction to discontent in the relationship, and then you have a

whole other type of infidelity that may have very little to do with

the relationship that is much more rooted in an individual's

experience of absence and of longing. One of the most interesting

things that I learned after ten years of working primarily with

couples and families with infidelity, is the fact that it happens in

good relationships, too. It happens in happy couples too. Yes, that

sometimes when a person goes elsewhere, they're not just because

going elsewhere, because they want to leave the person that they are

with, but sometimes it's because they want to leave the person that

they have themselves become. Oh, and it's not so much that they're

going to look for someone else as much as they're going to look for

another self or other parts of themselves that have been lost. That

woman that is at home that has been caring for her children, that is

just the mother, the wife that has not thought about herself for God

knows how long, sometimes finds herself when the yearning to once

again bring back the woman behind the mother. And she's not

rejecting her life, she just yearns to bring back a part of her

life, of herself that she doesn't know how to integrate in the life

that she has created. And that's a whole other range of affairs. But

the important part of this, when you ask the question, why do people

have affairs, is to not think that this is something that is

happening in a few places, just only about 85% of us have been

affected by the experience of infidelity as the children of the

parent who was unfaithful, or as the child of an illicit

relationship or as one of the three protagonists in the adulterous

triangle, or as the friend that is participating in a drama. It's

not an unknown story. And so I think, most importantly for me, in

writing a book about infidelity, which was, in a way, writing a book

about what happens when desire goes looking elsewhere. Yeah, it's to

say this is gutting, this is beyond painful, and we need a different

conversation that is going to help the millions of us who are

affected by it to just be black and white, judgmental victim

perpetrator is really not helpful to so many of us.

Sarah:

Do you think people can repair from infidelity? Couples can

repair from it and leave together happy, joyous relationships after?

Or I know that trust is obviously a huge thing in anyone's

relationship with a friend as well. Once that is severed, can it be

replenished again?

Esther:

Some affairs will kill a relationship that was already dying on

the vine, and some affairs will be the most powerful alarm system

that will jolt a couple out of a state of complacency and laziness,

and finally make it realise that it stands to lose way more than it

wanted to. Yeah. And so, yes, there are people who come out of an

affair and they will tell you this was the worst day of our life,

but it changed us and it brought us on a track. And we are a much

better couple today and more honest today than we ever were. That

is, of course, the better outcome that we wish for many people. I

would hope that more people would actually experience that, but

sometimes it's irretrievable and too many broken pieces and you

can't piece them back together. The rebuilding of the trust is

really not just about you won't do this again, because the majority

of people who come to therapy around affairs are people who have

been faithful and. No games for years. Really? Five, ten, 25 years.

The majority are not chronic philanderer and the chronic philanderer

have other issues. So you asked yourself always, why would a person

cross a line that they never thought they would cross? For a glimmer

of what? When they risk losing everything they spend a lifetime

building. Why? Right. That's the original question for me. When I

wrote the State of Affairs story, it was about that. Why do people

go, you know, to that place where everything they worked for,

everything this labored so hard to build could be. And then you want

to know that trust is not just the promise of not reaching out

again. Trust is that you really experience a deep valuing of the

relationship. And the person who is unfaithful sometimes trashed the

relationship. And that's often the case when there's no rebuilding

possible. But often the person who also had an affair is the one

who's been yearning for you to finally pay attention to them, listen

to them, kiss them on occasion, touch them, make love to them,

treasure them. And that's when I came up with the second big finding

in the book, which is that the victim of the affair is not always

the victim of the marriage.

Sarah:

Oh, it gives me shivers. It's so true. You said something last

night about. Our phones are the closest thing to us. And I suppose

if they are, and that you're trying to engage with your partner and

they're constantly working or on their phone, those people who are

loving.

Happy.

May look for an affair because their self-esteem is low, and

they just want to feel like they're acknowledged and attractive.

Esther:

And I prefer to look at it slightly different, which is to say

that relational betrayal comes in many forms. Decades of neglect and

indifference and criticism and poor treatment is also a betrayal.

Sarah:

Yes.

Esther:

Then we are talking about it's not just, oh, I felt bad about

myself and I needed I needed someone to laugh at my jokes, you know,

and I needed a little boost because then it looks very trite. Yes.

And there are, there is that too. But in. But if you really are

going to go in the depth of what allows a couple to rebuild, it is

also to understand, you know, how they came to a place where at the

heart of affairs you will see lying, deception, betrayal, violations

of trust. But at the heart of affairs you also see longing and

yearning for connection, for aliveness, for intimacy.

Sarah:

S2: From your experience, what makes a good relationship?

Esther:

Many, many different things, really. I mean, I'm asked this

question every night on this Australian tour right now, and I could

answer it differently every night, you know? Um, because. What makes

a good relationship is different for different people because they

have different needs, first of all, so there isn't a one size fits

all. I think we really have to be careful to not think what makes a

good tomato soup. Yeah, you want a few basic ingredients that, you

know, a good ripe tomato, lush tomato that there's a lot of taste

will be different than a can. There's a few basic things, you know,

but for the rest, how you play with this spice so that Spice

Relationships has a bit of that too. You need some core features.

And then around that you play with all the other ingredients and you

mix and match and you change them in the course of a life. So what

makes a great relationship, number one, is the ability to change, to

be flexible, to be adaptive to the new reality. The new reality may

be we just moved in. You just had your mother come in. We're in a

lockdown. We've had a third child. I have a new career. We going to

another country? You got sick. Whatever is the ingredients that

reality throws into your relationship, you know? And that adaptation

is really, really important. I think that admiration goes a long

way. You notice couples where one person talks about their partner

with admiration, and you know that the admiration also means that

you're usually quite pleased to wake up with them in the morning.

What makes a good relationship? I just spoke with somebody just

before coming here and who was telling me, having come to the event

last night, I have a lot of work to do. I realize that I've been

projecting on my partner the things that I experienced with my

father, and I often do this and this and this. And I just said, have

you ever told this to your partner? This is 16 years into it,

because just the act of acknowledging, I know that there are things

I do which are painful, frustrating, upsetting, undermine our

relationship. The ability to take responsibility and ownership over

the things that we bring is huge. Because when I bring this to you

and I say, you know, I know that I'm sometimes really harsh and

critical and whatever you do, I barely notice. But whatever you

don't do, I make a big fuss about. And that sometimes is not fair.

But I come with a story, etcetera, etcetera, that that makes the

other person a feel that we're living in a shared reality, that you

see what you do to me, and I don't have to be the one always telling

you, you know that I know that you know, and that you're willing to

do something to make it better because I don't like it. A good

relationship is when you do plenty for the other person just because

it's the other person and not because you particularly care about

it, but you care about them. A good relationship is where people

laugh and are able to have perspective on stuff. A good relationship

is a relationship that has a constantly fluid balance between what

is together and what is separate, what is autonomous, and what is

interdependent. You know where one can say to the other person, go

do your thing and have a great time. A good relationship is where

people communicate without blame and defensiveness all the time. A

good relationship is a relationship that can fight and then also

make up, but they need to know to fight and they need to fight.

Fighting is important.

Sarah:

Why?

Esther:

Why? Because it's energy. Because it's friction.

Well. People fight much of the time because they care. I'm not

talking about all kind of fighting, but a lot of the fighting is.

I'm asking this again because I really care. In many instances, you

can have said I did you no fighting anymore. You're done. But

there's a better way to be connected and to experience heat than

through friction. Or there's a better kind of friction than the

hostile friction.

Sarah:

Yes.

Esther:

So it's a beautiful thing about relationship that actually

there's many things. And I can give you what the research says and

how it studied this thing versus that thing. But I think the nicest

question is to ask a couple what makes you relationship a good

relationship. My partner has my back. I can trust them. He makes me

laugh when I'm in the midst of. They are a good person. They're

kind. They've been so good to my mother. Whatever. I feel safe here.

Or I can be bold here. Or I get a partner who pushes me all the

time. Yesterday I asked a question. The person that challenges me

most and quite a few people said themselves, but many of them said

my partner and they took the word, challenged me in. In the

positive. They push me across a line. They make me be bold. They

give me the confidence I lack sometimes, you know, or they keep me

behind the line when I'm about to cross it. They have a positive

power over me or toward me.

Sarah:

We've spoken about having a lot of teachers yourself, especially

in the early days, and you speak to a lot of people. What's the best

advice that you have ever been given?

Esther:

I'm given advice every day. I am an advice seeker. Yes, I make

my decisions with a lot of consultation, and I think some of the

best advice I get is when people remind me what is the goal? What am

I going for? And help me not get too distracted? The best advice is

when people say, have you ever considered that? And they're taking

me three steps ahead of where I had imagined I could be? It's when

they expand the visions for me, and I think that that's been like

that since I was a teenager. You know, as a kid, I would go to camp

and in camp in Belgium, at the end of camp, everybody would write

little messages to people, and your youth counselors and the other

people would send you this. And recently I found a box of these

messages of what people would write to me that I kept at the end of

and so much of the time it was about, you have a lot of ideas, but

you lack confidence. You know. Yes yes yes yes. Yes. And. I think

that these messages were so perceptive. They just really understood

something that I was more bold than many. So what may have been lack

of confidence for me is still plenty in the general sense. But they

always said, you could do this if you only believed in yourself

more. And, you know, at this point, I'm pretty much at the believing

of myself.

Sarah:

I wanted to say, you've got your new card game and it is so

divine. Where should we begin? And I wanted to know, can I ask you a

question or you pick. It's my first time. Will be like a tarot

reader.

Esther:

Should I say something about what it is?

Sarah:

Yes.

Please do tell. You started this in lockdown. The idea came in

lockdown. So I'd love you to talk about why that came to you then.

Esther:

So there's two moments. Yes. The first moment is I'm in

lockdown. You have been in lockdown here in Melbourne. You know the

story.

Sarah:

S4: I know a lot about lockdown.

Esther:

I get a video and I get these little kids and they're playing

and they're playing that. They're running in a river and they're

chasing away to go hide in a castle. But the river is made up of

rocks, and the rocks are the books, and the pillars are the castles.

And and I'm looking at this whole thing and I'm thinking, wow,

freedom in confinement comes from our imagination.

Sarah:

Yeah.

Esther:

That is the imagination as heroes and as aliveness, as

playfulness, as curiosity and play is what helps us transcend the

limit of reality. And I'm thinking this is for them. This is true

for us, too. How do we remain curious with the people that we're

living with day in, day out? How do we remain curious even about

ourselves? How do we hear new stories? How do we ask good questions

to people we just met, so that we actually get to learn things about

them that we would never have imagined, like the 4000 people did

yesterday in the theater. Stories is the way we tell about our life.

Relationships are stories. Stories are bridges for connection, and

curiosity is the essential element here and in relationships. Much

of our work is about taking people who are reactive and turning them

into being curious.

Sarah:

Wow.

Esther:

So the game creates a safe container for this where you can

experiment, where you can tell stories because you're playing you

you're you're in a whole different frame than if you are in a

literal conversation. And so when I watch parents play with kids,

and I see these kids be able to say things to their parents that

they would never say in normal circumstances, but because they're

playing, they get to tell the story. When I see people on the first

date, when I see couples who are bored with each other and could

really use a new conversation with some fresh air. The card game

creates all of those opportunities, including at work, in a team

that wants to get to know each other. And it's all in the questions.

Sarah:

When the interviewer. I know that as well. Even when I get interviews, I

always think to myself, it is. Your answers are in the questions. So

the questions have to be good and can take it to an absolute new

level. You talk about imagination when I interviewed that Holocaust

survivor, she was six when she was in the camps. And I remember she

said to me, she used to imagine herself back in Poland and the fun

times that she had with her parents, and she used to just sit there

thinking about that and just recreating that in her mind whilst she

was in the camp, and she said that was what was able to get her

through as well.

Esther:

Right. So this is what I mean, that the central agent of eroticism is in our imagination.

It is true when you are in camp. It is true when you are trapped in

a relationship. It is true in lockdown. It is true when you're

trapped in a story and in a way of telling about your life. When

it's time to change, we have the capacity to anticipate and to

project and to see ourselves even when it's not happening, but

experience it as if it was happening.

Sarah:

Yeah, that's so powerful. All right, Esther you.

Esther:

Oh, a rule I secretly love to break. I'm a break rule breaker.

Period. So there's no specific one. And it's not always even secret.

Sarah:

Um, I love that. It's not even secret.

Esther:

It's not even a secret. I find rule breaking very, very freeing because the only

one of the main times I know that I'm doing what I want is when I'm

doing something I'm not supposed to do. Yeah. So if it's about

eating something I shouldn't be eating or staying up to three hours

late when I have to get up the next morning early, because that's

what a responsible, you know, professional would do. Or anytime I

actually have a little rule in my own head. And then I say, yeah, I

find the transgression liberating, empowering, and freeing.

Sarah:

I love that, and very playful for that matter.

I'm like you. I like to break rules as well, and I don't mean it

in a negative way. Like I'm always looking to break rules, but I

have this thing with authority. Sometimes I don't like authority,

and even though I'm very respectful towards it, I always question

things, and I think that's why I ended up in the profession I did.

I'd always go out and question why things are. And I think in that

sense, just because people say we should do something, I don't

always think that that's. Do you think that. That's connected to

your grandfather?

Esther:

Potentially, yes, I think I think it probably is because.

Because he came from a time.

When people did what they were told to do and it wasn't the right thing.

Sarah:

Yes. And I've always probably charged my own path and been able to

get there by not always doing what people say. And yeah, that's I've

never actually thought about it like that. So that's unbelievably

interesting. I wonder, Esther, our final question, what is a life of

greatness to you?

Esther:

I always thought as a child that I would do something big. Big

as in that it would make a difference, that it would matter, because

I felt that I was alive when the rest of my family had been

decimated, and I had to kind of live for all the ones that hadn't

had a chance. So I had this idea that my life couldn't be mediocre

or small or not noticeable. I didn't know what it would look like,

and I dreamed as a child, I fantasized a lot of these stories of

doing something big that would make it feel like I had claimed my

place on this earth to make up for all the dead ones. And today I

would say it's, I mean, being in front of 4000 people and creating

an intimate conversation about relationships that is honest, that

asks the deep questions, and that is light at the same time, deep

and light and provocative and probing, um, to come. To Australia and

to realise that people have been listening to the podcast. Where

should we begin? Or to read my book or to read the blog? That's a

life of greatness. It's like, how did these people on the other side

of the planet, you know, have spent so much time with me, have been

listening to me find what I say valuable, use it to improve their

relationships, and then come with my family and my team and meet my

friends here. I feel like it's abundant, it's playful, it's rich. In

that sense, I consider that greatness.

Sarah:

Esther Perel I always knew this about you, but I saw last night

this hunger, these people coming to watch you and hanging on your

every word, but doing it a way because you provide so much to people

who are sometimes longing for something in their life, in their

relationships. And you've always done it in a way that is so

tasteful, so easy to understand, and thought provoking to so many

people. And honestly, you have changed the life of thousands,

millions, I'm sure, of people out there. So for that I say thank you

very much and thank you for the wonderful chat today. Thank you.

Esther:

S3: So much. Pleasure.


To purchase Esther's card game 'Where should we begin' head to: https://bit.ly/3zUssuB

It's now available on AMAZON with low international shipping fees. Play and enjoy!

Purchase Sarah's Manifest Your Greatness Course here: https://bit.ly/3FQvkMS

Purchase Sarah's Kid's Meditation: https://bit.ly/3kfVJMh

Instagram: instagram.com/sarahgrynberg

Website: https://sarahgrynberg.com/

Facebook: facebook.com/sarahgrynberg

Twitter: twitter.com/sarahgrynberg

YouTube: youtube.com/sarahgrynberg

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Discussion about this episode

User's avatar